Are you an urban explorer or a thrill seeker? I think it comes down to the camera you use and why you take photographs.

Are your photos more about proving you were there or getting a better look at what you've seen? I pick my camera for the zoom up feature. I want to get a closer view of things I can't access (due to distance, obstacles, ethics, etc.). I'm not hanging, one-armed, from a crane taking photos of my feet in mid-air. I like a camera which picks up colours, has a sharp focus and can handle being out in the rain on occasion. But, zoom comes first. Why did you pick your camera? Does the camera really matter as long as it's easy to carry and pull out for a quick photo?

Another way to tell if you're an explorer is how you handle questions about what you're doing.

If someone approaches you at the location do you run away or have a conversation with them? Even the police and security will chat and often leave you alone if you explain you're just taking photographs and being careful not to cause damage or get hurt. If you hide and run away - there's a reason for that. Either you want the thrill of escaping "the law" or you were there for the thrill and don't want to get caught vandalizing or doing something else you shouldn't have been doing. Someone asked me why I explore and I've never found a good, single, solid reason. But, I know I don't explore for the thrill. The element of danger, knowing I'm on private property, those are the things I don't like about exploring. Those are the things which keep me from getting closer when I'd like to see more of a place. For me the thrill is finding the old place, looking at the weathered buildings, the details in stonework, and trying to show what I'm feeling in a photograph. I don't want to prove I was there but I do want to share what I have seen. I want to preserve it so others can see the places as I found them.